𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Microscopy analysis of bone marrow–derived osteoprogenitor cells cultured on hydrogel 3-D scaffold

✍ Scribed by S. Srouji; S. Maurice; E. Livne


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2005
Tongue
English
Weight
541 KB
Volume
66
Category
Article
ISSN
1059-910X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Bone marrow contains progenitor cells that are able to differentiate into several mesenchymal lineages, including bone. These cells may also provide a potential therapy for bone repair. The purpose of this study was to select the osteoprogenitor cell subpopulation from bone marrow–derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and to test the ability of a hydrogel scaffold to support growth and osteogenic differentiation. MSCs isolated from rat femur bone marrow were cultured in DMEM medium supplemented with antibiotics, FCS, and L‐glutamine. Osteogenic supplements (dexamethasone, sodium β‐glycerophosphate, and ascorbic acid) were added for one, two or three weeks. A selective subpopulation of osteoprogenitor cells was identified by immunohistochemistry, general morphology, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS). Committed osteogenic cells were transferred to a 3‐D hydrogel scaffold and cultured for an additional week. In standard culture, the osteoprogenitor cells formed cell clusters identified by Alizarin red S staining and by positive osteocalcin immunostaining. The number of osteoprogenitor cells, matrix synthesis, and mineralization increased gradually up to three weeks in culture. Mineral deposition in the matrix analyzed by EDS revealed the presence of calcium and phosphate ions at a Ca/P molar ratio of 1.73 in both the osteogenic cultures and the scaffold osteoprogenitor culture. Histological preparations revealed cell clusters within the hydrogel scaffold and SEM analysis revealed cell clusters attached to the scaffold surface. It is concluded that the hydrogel scaffold can support growth and differentiation of osteogenic cultures including mineralization and can potentially serve as a bone graft substitute containing committed osteoprogenitor cells. Microsc. Res. Tech. 66:132–138, 2005. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Engineering of osteoinductive grafts by
✍ S. Scaglione; A. Braccini; D. Wendt; C. Jaquiery; F. Beltrame; R. Quarto; Ivan M 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 334 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract In this work, we investigated whether osteoinductive constructs can be generated by isolation and expansion of sheep bone marrow stromal cells (BMSC) directly within three‐dimensional (3D) ceramic scaffolds, bypassing the typical phase of monolayer (2D) expansion prior to scaffold loadi

Three step derivation of cartilage like
✍ Hai Yan Bai; Gui An Chen; Gen Hong Mao; Tian Ran Song; Yan Xia Wang 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 807 KB

## Abstract In this study a three step culture system, 2D‐3D sequential culture __in vitro__ and further implantation __in vivo__ was developed to induce human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) into cartilage like tissues. Five‐day‐old embryoid bodies were plated for chondrogenic induction for 27 days (