## Abstract ## Objectives/Hypothesis: To critically review current literature comparing microscopic versus endoscopic surgery in the treatment of pituitary adenomas. ## Study Design: Systematic review of the literature. ## Methods: All English language literature published between January 1989
β¦ LIBER β¦
Microscope and endoscopic pituitary surgery
β Scribed by Michael Powell
- Publisher
- Springer Vienna
- Year
- 2009
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 147 KB
- Volume
- 151
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0001-6268
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Microscopic versus endoscopic pituitary
β
Brian Rotenberg; Samantha Tam; Won Hyung A. Ryu; Neil Duggal
π
Article
π
2010
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 92 KB
Endoscopic pituitary surgery
β
Paolo Cappabianca; Luigi Maria Cavallo; Oreste de Divitiis; Domenico Solari; Fel
π
Article
π
2008
π
Springer US
π
English
β 153 KB
Sinus surgery: Endoscopic and microscopi
β
Christine Franzese
π
Article
π
2006
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 58 KB
Endoscopic pituitary surgery - a. beginn
β
Nishit J. Shah; Mukul Navnit; Chandrashekhar E. Deopujari; Shraddha S. Mukerji
π
Article
π
2004
π
Springer
π
English
β 608 KB
Olfactory outcomes after endoscopic tran
β
Brian W. Rotenberg; Samantha Saunders; Neil Duggal
π
Article
π
2011
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 76 KB
## Abstract ## Background: Olfaction has been demonstrated to have a great impact on patients' lives. Transsphenoidal endoscopic pituitary surgery is associated with potentially significant damage to olfactory tissues, but to date this issue has been only poorly documented in the literature. ## S
Endoscopic anatomy of sphenoid sinus for
β
A. Unlu; C. Meco; H.C. Ugur; A. Comert; M. Ozdemir; A. Elhan
π
Article
π
2008
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 207 KB