<p><P>The book attempts to describe and criticize four methods used in legal practice, legal dogmatics and legal theory: logic, analysis, argumentation and hermeneutics. Apart from a presentation of basic ideas connected with the above mentioned methods, the essays contained in this book seek to ans
Methods of Legal Reasoning
โ Scribed by Jerzy Stelmach, Bartosz Brozek
- Publisher
- Springer
- Year
- 2006
- Tongue
- English
- Leaves
- 236
- Series
- Law and Philosophy Library
- Edition
- 1
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
Methods of Legal Reasoning describes and criticizes four methods used in legal practice, legal dogmatics and legal theory: logic, analysis, argumentation and hermeneutics. The book takes the unusual approach of discussing in a single study four different, sometimes competing concepts of legal method. Sketched this way, the panorama allows the reader to reflect deeply on questions concerning the methodological conditioning of legal science and the existence of a unique, specific legal method.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
<span>Methods of Legal Reasoning describes and criticizes four methods used in legal practice, legal dogmatics and legal theory: logic, analysis, argumentation and hermeneutics. The book takes the unusual approach of discussing in a single study four different, sometimes competing concepts of legal
xxiv, 415 pages : 25 cm
xxvii, 408 p. : 25 cm
This useful handbook by Pierre Schlag and David Skover is designed to help lawyers and law students criticize and attack legal arguments. In this book, the authors catalogue the "tactics" or "counter-moves" that are routinely used to attack legal arguments.