๐”– Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

๐Ÿ“

Methods of Legal Reasoning

โœ Scribed by Jerzy Stelmach, Bartosz Brozek


Publisher
Springer
Year
2006
Tongue
English
Leaves
236
Series
Law and Philosophy Library
Edition
1
Category
Library

โฌ‡  Acquire This Volume

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Methods of Legal Reasoning describes and criticizes four methods used in legal practice, legal dogmatics and legal theory: logic, analysis, argumentation and hermeneutics. The book takes the unusual approach of discussing in a single study four different, sometimes competing concepts of legal method. Sketched this way, the panorama allows the reader to reflect deeply on questions concerning the methodological conditioning of legal science and the existence of a unique, specific legal method.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Methods of legal reasoning
โœ Jerzy Stelmach, Bartosz Brozek (auth.) ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2006 ๐Ÿ› Springer Netherlands ๐ŸŒ English

<p><P>The book attempts to describe and criticize four methods used in legal practice, legal dogmatics and legal theory: logic, analysis, argumentation and hermeneutics. Apart from a presentation of basic ideas connected with the above mentioned methods, the essays contained in this book seek to ans

Methods of Legal Reasoning (Law and Phil
โœ Jerzy Stelmach ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2006 ๐Ÿ› Springer ๐ŸŒ English

<span>Methods of Legal Reasoning describes and criticizes four methods used in legal practice, legal dogmatics and legal theory: logic, analysis, argumentation and hermeneutics. The book takes the unusual approach of discussing in a single study four different, sometimes competing concepts of legal

Tactics of Legal Reasoning
โœ Pierre Schlag, David Skover ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 1986 ๐Ÿ› Carolina Academic Press ๐ŸŒ English

This useful handbook by Pierre Schlag and David Skover is designed to help lawyers and law students criticize and attack legal arguments. In this book, the authors catalogue the "tactics" or "counter-moves" that are routinely used to attack legal arguments.