๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials Comparing Open and Laparoscopic Anti-Reflux Surgery

โœ Scribed by Peters, Matthew James; Mukhtar, Athar; Yunus, Rossita Mohamad; Khan, Shahjahan; Pappalardo, Juanita; Memon, Breda; Memon, Muhammed Ashraf


Book ID
125526586
Publisher
Nature Publishing Group
Year
2009
Tongue
English
Weight
217 KB
Volume
104
Category
Article
ISSN
0002-9270

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Randomized clinical trial comparing lapa
โœ J. Lujan; G. Valero; Q. Hernandez; A. Sanchez; M. D. Frutos; P. Parrilla ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2009 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 128 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

## Abstract ## Background The laparoscopic treatment of rectal cancer is controversial. This study compared surgical outcomes after laparoscopic and open approaches for mid and low rectal cancers. ## Methods Some 204 patients with mid and low rectal adenocarcinomas were allocated randomly to ope

Meta-analysis of randomized controlled t
โœ S. S. Forbes; C. Eskicioglu; R. S. McLeod; A. Okrainec ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2009 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 129 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

## Abstract ## Background Laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair has been reported in a number of small trials to have equivalent or superior outcomes to open repair. ## Methods Randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic and open incisional or ventral hernia repair with mesh