𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Mentorship in otolaryngology residency: The resident perspective

✍ Scribed by Amy K Hsu; Abtin Tabaee; Mark S. Persky


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2010
Tongue
English
Weight
101 KB
Volume
120
Category
Article
ISSN
0023-852X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Objectives/Hypothesis:

To assess the current state of mentorship in otolaryngology residency.

Study Design:

Internet‐based anonymous survey of chief residents in otolaryngology residency.

Methods:

Nonidentifying demographic information, career plans, and general questions about residency experience were queried. Participants were asked to rate their mentorship experience in general and specifically with regard to research, personal quality of life, and career preparation. Responses were scored using a five‐point ordinal Likert scale, with higher scores representing more favorable responses.

Results:

The survey was completed by 47 (17.2%) respondents. Eighteen respondents (38%) were assigned an official faculty mentor, and 23 respondents (49%) were assigned a research mentor during their residency. Thirty‐nine respondents (83%) reported receiving meaningful mentorship from faculty who were not officially assigned mentors. Overall, 18 respondents (38%) were neutral or not satisfied with the mentorship they received during residency. Statistically significant higher scores were noted for mentorship in career preparation (median, 4) versus mentorship in research (median, 4; P < .001) and resident quality of life (median, 3; P < .001). Lower scores were noted for availability of mentorship in preparation for a career in private practice versus academic medicine (median, 4 vs. 5; P < .001). Residents who were officially assigned mentors reported statistically significant higher scores with regard to satisfaction with the overall mentorship experience (median, 4 vs. 3; P = .05) and different aspects of mentorship in career preparation and research training.

Conclusions:

The current study reveals variability in the mentorship experience in otolaryngology residency. Potential deficiencies may exist, including absence of formal mentorship in some residency programs. Increased attention to mentorship, especially with regard to research, career preparation, and quality of life may improve the overall residency experience.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Residency in perspective
✍ James Paekhouse πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1969 πŸ› Springer-Verlag 🌐 French βš– 433 KB
Learning styles in two otolaryngology re
✍ Kulsoom Laeeq; Robert A. Weatherly; Alice Carrott; Vinciya Pandian; Charles W. C πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2009 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 185 KB

## Abstract ## Objectives/Hypothesis: Kolb portrays four learning styles depending on how an individual grasps or transforms experience: accommodating, assimilating, diverging, and converging. Past studies in surgery, medicine, and anesthesia identified the predominant learning style in each of th

Perspectives in residence-time distribut
✍ J.C.R. Turner πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1983 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 399 KB

A short history is given of the development of interest in residence-time distributions. Attention is concentrated on the role played in this development by Danckwerts' 1953 paper[6]. This defined the residence-time functions in the form now customarily used, and much subsequent development remains

Under the microscope: Assessing surgical
✍ Matthew L. Carlson; David J. Archibald; Abraham J. Sorom; Eric J. Moore πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2010 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 385 KB

## Abstract ## Objectives/Hypothesis: Application to otolaryngology residency is a highly competitive process. Programs identify the best candidates by evaluating academic performance in medical school, board scores, research experience, performance during an interview, and letters of recommendati