๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Memory for previous recall: a comparison of free and cued recall

โœ Scribed by Laura Maria Padilla-Walker; Debra Ann Poole

Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2002
Tongue
English
Weight
69 KB
Volume
16
Category
Article
ISSN
0888-4080

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

Comparison of the neural correlates of r
Comparison of the neural correlates of retrieval success in tests of cued recall and recognition memory
โœ Kayoko Okada; Kaia L. Vilberg; Michael D. Rugg ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2011 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 975 KB

## Abstract The neural correlates of successful retrieval on tests of word stem recall and recognition memory were compared. In the recall test, subjects viewed word stems, half of which were associated with studied items and half with unstudied items, and for each stem attempted to recall a corres

Untangling the benefits of multiple stud
Untangling the benefits of multiple study opportunities and repeated testing for cued recall
โœ William L. Cull ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2000 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 175 KB

Spacing multiple study opportunities apart from one another is known by psychologists to be a highly eective study method (see Dempster, 1996). This study examines whether including tests during study would produce practical beneยฎts for learning beyond that provided by distributed study alone. In ad

Hippocampal context processing is critic
Hippocampal context processing is critical for interference free recall of odor memories in rats
โœ Dan A. Butterly; Maurice A. Petroccione; David M. Smith ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2011 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 431 KB

## Abstract Interference is a critical problem for memory systems and a primary cause of retrieval failure. One strategy for minimizing interference is to associate the items to be remembered with the context in which they were learned. For example, human subjects who learn two lists of words in se