✦ LIBER ✦

Medical simulation: No longer “why” but “how”

✍ Scribed by Peter G. Brindley

Book ID: 113696831
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 2009
Tongue: English
Weight: 64 KB
Volume: 24
Category: Article
ISSN: 0883-9441
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2008.08.013

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Low-grade glioma: no longer to treat or

Low-grade glioma: no longer to treat or not to treat, but why to treat

✍ Lynn Stuart Ashby 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 Elsevier 🌐 English ⚖ 69 KB

Over the Counter but No Longer under the

Over the Counter but No Longer under the Radar — Pediatric Cough and Cold Medications

✍ Sharfstein, Joshua M.; North, Marisa; Serwint, Janet R. 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 Massachusetts Medical Society 🌐 English ⚖ 321 KB

Harnessing monocyte-derived macrophages

Harnessing monocyte-derived macrophages to control central nervous system pathologies: no longer ‘if’ but ‘how’

✍ Shechter, Ravid; Schwartz, Michal 📂 Article 📅 2012 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 446 KB

Vascular occlusion and vascular closure

Vascular occlusion and vascular closure devices: Definitely associated, but still no idea how often or why

✍ Zoltan G. Turi 📂 Article 📅 2012 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 687 KB

The European union: The Danes said ‘no’

The European union: The Danes said ‘no’ in 1992 but ‘yes’ in 1995: How and why?

✍ Karen Siune; Palle Svensson; Ole Tonsgaard 📂 Article 📅 1994 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 827 KB

Rotting with their rights on: why the cr

Rotting with their rights on: why the criteria for ending commitment or restraint of liberty need not be the same as the criteria for initiating commitment or restraint of liberty, and how the restraint may sometimes justifiably continue after its prerequisites are no longer satisfied

✍ Ken Kress 📂 Article 📅 2006 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 185 KB

## Abstract That coerced treatment must end when the criteria for initiating coerced treatment cease to apply appears to be universally accepted by courts and commentators.2 Moreover, the consensus appears to be justified by a steel‐trap argument. If coercion is justified only when the patient is m