𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Medical Malpractice and Hearing Loss

✍ Scribed by Ryan K. Sewell; Gary F. Moore


Book ID
102448073
Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2009
Tongue
English
Weight
246 KB
Volume
119
Category
Article
ISSN
0023-852X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


OBJECTIVE: Hearing loss is both a common patient complaint and possible complication that can affect nearly all specialties. The study examines medical malpractice trends in hearing loss.

METHODS: 260 medical malpractice cases involving hearing loss sino-nasal disease between 1988 and 2007 were obtained from a computerized legal database.

RESULTS: Defendants prevailed in 48% (124/260) of the cases. Plaintiffs received jury verdicts in 28% (73/260) with a mean award of $1.1 million. The parties reached a settlement in 24% (63/260) with a mean award of $740,000. Defense outcomes were higher for partial loss versus total loss (55% vs 39%, p=0.025) and mean awards were higher for total loss ($1.5 million vs $400,000, p<0.001). As the patient population aged, defendant verdicts increased (p<0.001) and awards increased (p<0.001). Hearing loss related to otologic surgery was claimed in 49 cases. Defendants prevailed in 53% (26/49), with a mean award of $310,000.

CONCLUSIONS: Medical malpractice related to hearing loss can be encountered by multiple specialties. As the hearing loss worsens, both the likelihood of an award and the amount increases. Age also seems to predict the likelihood of both defendant verdicts and size of the awards. Future studies should focus on risk management strategies to reduce the exposure to medical malpractice related to hearing loss.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Migraine and Medical Malpractice
✍ Randolph W. Evans; James C. Johnston πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2011 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 54 KB
Medical malpractice defined and describe
✍ Deborah Christiane Lacombe; Lindsay M. Watanabe πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1990 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 694 KB