Mechanisms underlying mirror movements in Parkinson's disease: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study
✍ Scribed by Massimo Cincotta; Alessandra Borgheresi; Fabrizio Balestrieri; Fabio Giovannelli; Aldo Ragazzoni; Paola Vanni; Francesco Benvenuti; Gaetano Zaccara; Ulf Ziemann
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2006
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 194 KB
- Volume
- 21
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0885-3185
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
The neural mechanisms underlying unintended mirror movements (MMs) of one hand during unimanual movements of the other hand in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) are largely unexplored. Here we used surface electromyographic (EMG) analysis and focal transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to investigate the pathophysiological substrate of MMs in four PD patients. Surface EMG was recorded from both abductor pollicis brevis (APB) and first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscles. Cross‐correlation EMG analysis revealed no common motor drive to the two APBs during intended unimanual tasks. Focal TMS of either primary motor cortex (M1) elicited normal motor‐evoked potentials (MEPs) in the contralateral APB, whereas MEPs were not seen in the ipsilateral hand. During either mirror or voluntary APB contraction, focal TMS of the contralateral M1 produced a long‐lasting silent period (SP), whereas stimulation of the ipsilateral M1 produced a short‐lasting SP. During either mirror or voluntary finger tapping, 5 Hz repetitive TMS (rTMS) of the contralateral M1 disrupted EMG activity in the target FDI, whereas the effects of rTMS of the ipsilateral M1 were by far slighter. During either mirror or voluntary APB contraction, paired‐pulse TMS showed a reduction of short‐interval intracortical inhibition in the contralateral M1. These findings provide converging evidence that, in PD, MMs do not depend on unmasking of ipsilateral projections but are explained by motor output along the crossed corticospinal projection from the mirror M1. © 2006 Movement Disorder Society
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract In a placebo‐controlled, single‐blinded, crossover study, we assessed the effect of “real” repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) versus “sham” rTMS (placebo) on peak dose dyskinesias in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). Ten patients with PD and prominent dyskinesias
## Abstract Sleep disorders are common in Parkinson's disease (PD) and have profound negative influences on quality of life. Sleep structure in healthy participants can be changed by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), but this has never been studied systematically in PD. Therefore
## Abstract Previous studies in patients with Parkinson's disease have reported that a single session of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) can improve some or all of the motor symptoms for 30 to 60 minutes. A recent study suggested that repeated sessions of rTMS lead to effects th