The 29Si spin-lattice relaxation times, &(%), of the various silicate anions present in high-purity alkaline silicate solutions are reported. Regular silicate cages display the longest T,(29Si) values and, in the case of the cubic octamenc cage, an unexpectedly large nuclear Overhauser enhancement,
Mechanisms of tissue–iron relaxivity: Nuclear magnetic resonance studies of human liver biopsy specimens
✍ Scribed by Nilesh R. Ghugre; Thomas D. Coates; Marvin D. Nelson; John C. Wood
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2005
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 402 KB
- Volume
- 54
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0740-3194
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
MRI is becoming an increasingly important tool to assess iron overload disorders, but the complex nature of proton–iron interactions has troubled noninvasive iron quantification. Intersite and intersequence variability as well as methodological inaccuracies have been limiting factors to its widespread clinical use. It is important to understand the underlying proton relaxation mechanisms within the (human) tissue environment to address these differences. In this respect, NMR relaxometry was performed on 10 fresh human liver biopsy specimens taken from patients with transfusion‐dependent anemia. T~1~ (1/R~1~) inversion recovery, T~2~ (1/R~2~) single echo, and multiecho T~2~ CPMG measurements were performed on a 60‐MHz Bruker Minispectrometer. NMR parameters were compared to quantitative iron levels and tissue histology. Relaxivities R~1~ and R~2~ both increased linearly with hepatic iron content, with R~2~ being more sensitive to iron. CPMG data were well described by a chemical‐exchange model and predicted effective iron center dimensions consistent with hemosiderin‐filled lysosomes. Nonexponential relaxation was evident at short refocusing intervals with R~2~ and amplitude behavior suggestive of magnetic susceptibility‐based compartmentalization rather than anatomic subdivisions. NMR relaxometry of human liver biopsy specimens yields unique insights into the mechanisms of tissue–iron relaxivity. Magn Reson Med, 2005. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract The original article to which this Erratum refers was published in Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 49(3):572–575 (2003)