Mechanisms leading to uniparental disomy and their clinical consequences
β Scribed by Wendy P. Robinson
- Book ID
- 101299270
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2000
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 174 KB
- Volume
- 22
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0265-9247
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Uniparental disomy (UPD) refers to the situation in which both copies of a chromosome pair have originated from one parent. In humans, it can result in clinical conditions by producing either homozygosity for recessive mutations or aberrant patterns of imprinting. Furthermore, UPD is frequently found in conjunction with mosaicism for a chromosomally abnormal cell line, which can also contribute to phenotypic abnormalities. Investigations into the mechanisms by which UPD may arise have helped to expand our general awareness of the impact of chromosomal abnormalities and chromosomal mosaicism in normal human development. Specifically, it appears that errors in the transmission of a chromosome from parent to gamete and during early somatic cell divisions are remarkably common but that embryo and cell selection during early embryogenesis help to ensure the presence of a numerically balanced chromosome complement in the developing fetus. UPD is also likely to occur within a portion of cells in all individuals simply as a consequence of somatic recombination occurring during mitotic cell divisions. This can be an important step in cancer development as well as a contributing factor to other late onset diseases. This review summarizes mechanisms by which UPD may arise and their associated clinical consequences.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Uniparental disomy (UPD) is the abnormal inheritance of two copies of a chromosome from the same parent. Possible mechanisms for UPD include trisomy rescue, monosomy rescue, gametic complementation, and somatic recombination. Most of these mechanisms can involve rearranged chromosomes, particularly
## By considering hypothetically the Bradford distribution, it is appropriate to model informetric distributions, to as a dynamic system developing in time on the principle the authors who refuted its validity, either suggesting a formally equivalent to that proposed by Simon, it was different appr