𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Mechanical properties of poly(ethylene terephthalate) modified with functionalized polymers

✍ Scribed by A. Pawlak; W. G. Perkins; F. L. Massey; A. Hiltner; E. Baer


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1999
Tongue
English
Weight
658 KB
Volume
73
Category
Article
ISSN
0021-8995

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


This study examined the effect of blending poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) with 5% of a functionalized polymer. The blends were characterized by particle size and size distribution, unnotched tensile behavior, toughness, and notch sensitivity. The improved properties of blends that incorporated a functionalized elastomer were consistent with in situ formation of a graft copolymer by reaction with PET end groups. Triblock copolymers were examined that had styrene end blocks and an ethylene/ butylene midblock (SEBS) with grafted maleic anhydride. The present study extended previous investigations that focused on level of grafting to examine the effects of component molecular weight and PET hydroxyl-to-carboxyl end-group ratio. Increasing the molecular weight of the SEBS and decreasing the hydroxyl-to-carboxyl ratio of the PET increased the effectiveness of the SEBS. In addition, a mix of an unfunctionalized SEBS with a functionalized SEBS was more effective than a single SEBS with the same total anhydride content. The same elastomers were the most effective for modifying a lower molecular weight PET (intrinsic viscosity 0.73) and a higher molecular weight PET (intrinsic viscosity 0.95). Some functionalized polypropylenes included in the study did not enhance the properties of PET.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Mechanical and Rheological Properties of
✍ Cheung, Man Ken; Chan, David πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1997 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 417 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

Poly(ethylene terephthalate) and polypropylene (PET/PP) were compounded and pelletized with a single-screw extruder. Standard ASTM tensile test specimens were made by injection moulding. The blends are stronger and sti †er than the plain PP specimens. The addition of a compatibilizer, EPOLENE E-43,