✦ LIBER ✦

Mechanical features of chemical shrinkage of cement paste

✍ Scribed by N. Setter; D.M. Roy

Book ID: 107728011
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 1978
Tongue: English
Weight: 798 KB
Volume: 8
Category: Article
ISSN: 0008-8846
DOI: 10.1016/0008-8846(78)90045-5

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

A reply to discussion by J. Baron and M.

A reply to discussion by J. Baron and M. Buil of the Paper “Mechanical features of chemical shrinkage of cement paste”

✍ Nava Setter; Della M. Roy 📂 Article 📅 1979 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 72 KB

We thank J. Baron and M. Buil for their reference to our work and for the interesting comparison they have made with their experimental results.

Remarques a propos de l'article “mechani

Remarques a propos de l'article “mechanical features of chemical shrinkage of cement pastes”, par N. Setter et D.M. Roy

✍ Jacques Baron; Michel Buil 📂 Article 📅 1979 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 145 KB

Chemical shrinkage and autogenous shrink

Chemical shrinkage and autogenous shrinkage of hydrating cement paste

✍ Ei-ichi Tazawa; Shingo Miyazawa; Tetsurou Kasai 📂 Article 📅 1995 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 325 KB

It is well known that the absolute volume of cement plus water decrease with progressive hydration. In this study, chemical shrinkage of cement was calculated from chemical equation of hydration, it was compared with observed one. Definition of chemical shrinkage and autogenous shrinkage was made an

Chemical shrinkage of portland cement pa

Chemical shrinkage of portland cement pastes

✍ Mette Geiker; Torben Knudsen 📂 Article 📅 1982 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 353 KB

Shrinkage mechanisms of hardened cement

Shrinkage mechanisms of hardened cement paste

✍ C.F. Ferraris; F.H. Wittmann 📂 Article 📅 1987 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 571 KB

Shrinkage mechanisms of hardened cement

Shrinkage mechanisms of hardened cement paste by Ferraris and Wittman

✍ S. Chatterji 📂 Article 📅 1988 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 140 KB

In this paper the authors tried to analyze their drying shrinkage data in terms of the Munich model. They have attributed the shrinkage below 40% RH to a change in the surface free energy (socalled Bangham shrinkage) and the shrinkage above 40% RH to the disjoining pressure. As the authors are propo