Measuring use of services for mental health problems in epidemiological surveys

✍ Scribed by Christine Sevilla-Dedieu; Viviane Kovess-Masfety; Matthias Angermeyer; Ronny Bruffaerts; Anna Fernandez; Giovanni De Girolamo; Ron De Graaf; Josep Maria Haro; Hans-Helmut König; The ESEMED/MHEDEA 2000 Investigators

• Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
• Year: 2011
• Tongue: English
• Weight: 131 KB
• Volume: 20
• Category: Article
• ISSN: 1049-8931
• DOI: 10.1002/mpr.346

✦ Synopsis

Abstract

The use of services for mental problems is generally reported as being relatively low. However, the methods used for data collection in surveys may have influenced the quality of self‐reported service use. This study compares the information on recourse to physicians for mental problems reported in different sections of a survey conducted in six European countries. Thus, 5545 respondents were asked questions on contacts with physicians at least twice: (1) after the symptoms checklist in any completed diagnostic section, and (2) in a section devoted to use of care for mental problems. Of these 39.3% reported contacts with physicians about mental problems in the diagnostic sections, whereas 29.5% did so in the use‐of‐care section. Inconsistencies concerned 20.1% of participants, among whom those reporting consultations in diagnostic sections without reporting them in the use‐of‐care section represented the majority (74.4%). Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that age, marital status, educational level and country were associated with under‐reporting in the use‐of‐care section, as well as having mood or sleep problems. In conclusion, services used for mental health reasons when measured through a question referring to use of care due to the presence of a mental problem may underestimate the care people received for their problems. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.