✦ LIBER ✦

Measuring Social Desirability: Short Forms of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale

✍ Scribed by Fischer, D. G.; Fick, C.

Book ID: 118026980
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Year: 1993
Tongue: English
Weight: 643 KB
Volume: 53
Category: Article
ISSN: 0013-1644
DOI: 10.1177/0013164493053002011

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

SHORT FORMS OF THE MARLOWE-CROWNE SOCIAL

SHORT FORMS OF THE MARLOWE-CROWNE SOCIAL DESIRABILITY SCALE

✍ BALLARD, REBECCA 📂 Article 📅 1992 🏛 Ammons Scientific 🌐 English ⚖ 187 KB

Validity of random short forms: II. The

Validity of random short forms: II. The Marlowe-Crowne social desirability scale

✍ A. B. Silverstein 📂 Article 📅 1983 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 190 KB 👁 3 views

Norwegian short-form of the Marlowe-Crow

Norwegian short-form of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale

✍ Floyd W. Rudmin 📂 Article 📅 1999 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 112 KB

FURTHER VALIDATION OF THREE SHORT FORMS

FURTHER VALIDATION OF THREE SHORT FORMS OF THE MARLOWE-CROWNE SCALE OF SOCIAL DESIRABILITY

✍ FRABONI, MARYANN; COOPER, DOUGLAS 📂 Article 📅 1989 🏛 Ammons Scientific 🌐 English ⚖ 200 KB

Development of reliable and valid short

Development of reliable and valid short forms of the marlowe-crowne social desirability scale

✍ William M. Reynolds 📂 Article 📅 1982 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 512 KB

Developed, on the basis of responses from 608 undergraduate students to the 33-item Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale, three short forms of 11, 12, and 13 items. The psychometric characteristics of these three forms and three other short forms develo ed by Strahan and Gerbasi (1972) were inve

Marlowe–Crowne Social Desirability Scale

Marlowe–Crowne Social Desirability Scale and short Form C: Forensic norms

✍ Paul Andrews; Robert G. Meyer 📂 Article 📅 2003 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 87 KB

## Abstract Marlowe–Crowne Social Desirability Scale (MC) (Crowne & Marlowe, 1960) scores were collected on 1096 individuals involved in forensic evaluations. No prior publication of forensic norms was found for this instrument, which provides a measure of biased self‐presentation (dissimulation).