Measuring knowledge of the insanity defense: Scale construction and validation
โ Scribed by Tarika Daftary-Kapur; Jennifer L. Groscup; Maureen O'Connor; Frank Coffaro; Michele Galietta
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2010
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 161 KB
- Volume
- 29
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0735-3936
- DOI
- 10.1002/bsl.938
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
This paper describes the construction and empirical evaluation of a new scale for measuring empowering leader behavior. Study One consisted of thorough interviews with external leaders and team members in three organizations. Behaviors elicited in the interviews were classiยฎed by researchers into ei
## Abstract ## Objective Symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA) is present in 1 in 8 patients age >60 years and is associated with significant activity limitation. Several tools have been devised to assess knee problems. The goal of this study was to evaluate the Oxford Knee Scale (OKS) against stri
Insanity evaluations are characterized by continued professional debate and the paucity of empirical research. To address the latter, the construct validity of the Rogers Criminal Responsibility Assessment Scales (R-CRAS; Rogers, 1984) was examined via an extensive re-analysis of 413 insanity cases.