𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Measurements of contraction latencies to mechanical and electrical stimulation of the protozoan, Spirostomum ambiguum

✍ Scribed by Thomas C. Hamilton; Dustan Osborn


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1977
Tongue
English
Weight
392 KB
Volume
91
Category
Article
ISSN
0021-9541

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Measurements made on contraction latencies in Spirostomum suggest that mechanical stimulation causes contractions to be initiated by the release of small amounts of calcium from a store tightly coupled to the contractile apparatus. Contraction to electrical stimulation appears to result from the gross electrophoretic mobilization of large amounts of calcium from a loosely coupled store. Contraction latencies to mechanical stimulation were three milliseconds and were independent of stimulus strength, previous stimulation, and contraction probability. For 0.5‐millisecond biphasic electrical stimulation the contraction latencies varied widely. Latencies to initial contractions were dependent on stimulus strength: from 1.0 milliseconds for a stimulus that caused a 100% probability of contraction to 2.0 milliseconds for a stimulus that caused a 10% probability of contraction. Latencies of contraction to electrical stimulation were also dependent upon previous stimulation, lengthening to over 300 milliseconds after ten minutes of stimulation. Initial contraction latencies were not affected by previous stimulation to the other (electrical or mechanical) stimulus modality. Repeated electrical stimulation also reduced the animal's resting length and slowed the rate of post contraction re‐extension, whereas mechanical stimulation did not have these effects.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Quantum-mechanical dynamics and quasicla
✍ Normand C. Blais; Meishan Zhao; Donald G. Truhlar; David W. Schwenke; Donald J. 📂 Article 📅 1990 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 709 KB

The state-to-state cross sections for D t Hz(u= 1, j= 1 )+HD(u'= I, j' =O-13) +H are calculated at the (very high) total energy 1.8 eV both by quasiclassical trajectories and by a well-converged quantum dynamical variational calculation on the most accurate available potential energy surface. Result