๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Measurements of bone mineral density of the proximal femur by two commercially available dual energy X-ray absorptiometric systems

โœ Scribed by Ole Lander Svendsen; Ulla Marslew; Christian Hassager; Claus Christiansen


Publisher
Springer
Year
1992
Tongue
English
Weight
513 KB
Volume
19
Category
Article
ISSN
0340-6997

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Two dual energy X-ray absorptiometric (DXA) instruments have recently become commercially available for local bone densitometry: the QDR-1000 (Hologic Inc.) and the DPX (Lunar Radiation Corp.). We report the precision, influence of femoral rotation, correla~tion and agreement of bone mineral measurements of the proximal femur by these two instruments. In vitro (femur phantom) short-term precision was 1.1%-3.5%, and the long-term precision was 1.2% 3.8%. In vivo (groups of 10 premenopausal and 10 postmenopausal women) short-term precision of duplicate measurements was 1.6%-4.7%, and long-term precision was 1.9%-5.5%. Overall, the precision for Ward's triangle was over 3% and that for the femoral neck and trochanter, 2%-3%. Rotation of a femur phantom produced a statistically significant change in the bone mineral density (BMD) of the femoral neck. Within a clinically relevant range of femoral rotation (20 ยฐ inward rotation _+5 ยฐ) the coefficient of variation (CV%) increased by a mean factor of 1.1-1.4. Although the correlation (r < 0.9) between BMD measurements of the proximal femur by the DPX and QDR-1000 in 30 postmenopausal women was high, there was lack of agreement between the two instruments. We found no statistically significant differences between the right and left femur in 30 postmenopausal women. A bilateral femur scan took a mean total time of about 22 rain. We conclude that with the introduction of DXA instruments, the precision of bone mineral measurements of the proximal femur has improved. However, for comparability between commercially available DXA instruments, it might be advantageous if units were standardized.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


A comparison of two dual-energy X-ray ab
โœ Khai C. Lai; Mitchell M. Goodsitt; Robert Murano; Charles H. Chesnut ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1992 ๐Ÿ› Springer ๐ŸŒ English โš– 668 KB

Two dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) systems--the Hologic QDR-1000 and the Norland XR-26 bone densitometers--were evaluated in terms of precision, accuracy, linearity of response, X-ray exposure, and correlation of in vivo spinal measurements. In vitro precision and accuracy studies were perf