𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Measurable selectors for the metric projection

✍ Scribed by B. Cascales; M. Raja


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2003
Tongue
English
Weight
136 KB
Volume
254-255
Category
Article
ISSN
0025-584X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Let Y and Z be two topological spaces and F : Y Γ— Z β†’ ℝ a function that is upper semi–continuous in the first variable and lower semi–continuous in the second variable. If Z is Polish and for every y ∈ Y there is a point z ∈ Z with F(y, z) = inf~w∈Z~ F(y, w) we prove that there is a nice measurable function h : Y β†’ Z satisfying F(y, h(y)) = inf~z∈Z~ F(y, z) for every y ∈ Y . As an application we obtain the existence of universally measurable selectors for the metric projection onto weakly K–analytic convex proximinal subsets of a Banach space, which then allows us to prove that L^p^(ΞΌ, Y ) is proximinal in L^p^(ΞΌ, X) for every proximinal weakly K–analytic subspace Y of a Banach space X.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


On the Norm of the Metric Projections
✍ Fernando Mazzone πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1999 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 87 KB

Let X be a Banach space. Given M a subspace of X we denote with P M the metric projection onto M. We define ?(X ) :=sup [&P M &: M a proximinal subspace of X]. In this paper we give a bound for ?(X ). In particular, when X=L p , we obtain the inequality &P M & 2 |2Γ‚ p&1| , for every subspace M of L

On the Metric Mahler Measure
✍ A Dubickas; C.J Smyth πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2001 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 176 KB

We define a new height function on the group of non-zero algebraic numbers :, the height of : being the infimum over all products of Mahler measures of algebraic numbers whose product is :. We call this height the metric Mahler measure, since its logarithm defines a metric in the factor group of the

Remote users in our midst: Insights from
✍ Magia G. Krause πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2009 πŸ› Wiley (John Wiley & Sons) 🌐 English βš– 32 KB

## Abstract Are there any differences between in‐person and remote users of archives? This paper addresses this question through the development and testing of two survey instruments intended to help archivists conduct user evaluations of their online resources. The surveys are part of a larger too