✦ LIBER ✦

Meaning and Morality in Everyday Life: Beyond “The Social Construction of …”

✍ Scribed by Colin Jerolmack

Book ID: 109298691
Publisher: Springer
Year: 2009
Tongue: English
Weight: 123 KB
Volume: 24
Category: Article
ISSN: 0884-8971
DOI: 10.1111/j.1573-7861.2009.01129_2.x

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

The Social Construction of Equality in E

The Social Construction of Equality in Everyday Life

✍ Scott R. Harris 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 Springer Netherlands 🌐 English ⚖ 87 KB

The importance of ‘morality’ in the soci

The importance of ‘morality’ in the social construction of suicide in Scottish newspapers

✍ Joanne Coyle; Doreen MacWhannell 📂 Article 📅 2002 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 139 KB

Everyday morality in families and a crit

Everyday morality in families and a critique of social capital: an investigation into moral judgements, responsibilities, and sentiments in Kyrgyzstani households

✍ Balihar Sanghera; Mehrigiul Ablezova; Aisalkyn Botoeva 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 Springer Netherlands 🌐 English ⚖ 288 KB

Special social behaviour—Social disabili

Special social behaviour—Social disability in our everyday life. A question to the disabled and nondisabled

✍ Bodo Januszewsky; Debra McDougall 📂 Article 📅 1985 🏛 Springer US 🌐 English ⚖ 310 KB

Challenges for Research Ethics and Moral

Challenges for Research Ethics and Moral Knowledge Construction in the Applied Social Sciences

✍ Stephen L. Payne 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 74 KB

Cancer patients and their network: the m

Cancer patients and their network: the meaning of the social network and social interactions for quality of life

✍ Johan H. Ruiter; Johanna C. J. M. Haes; Reike Tempelaar 📂 Article 📅 1993 🏛 Springer-Verlag 🌐 English ⚖ 411 KB

A lot of research is carried out on the subject of social relations and quality of life. One should find at least some indication for an association between the social environment and quality of life of cancer patients; will interventions be appropriate and well-considered? But until now, less has b