estimators of an unknown population size were compared in a computer simulation of capture-recapture sampling with replacement from small populations. The Bailey estimator was negatively bissed and had smaller variance than the Petenten estimator. The Petersen eatimator tended to be positively biase
โฆ LIBER โฆ
Mean and variance of R2 in small and moderate samples
โ Scribed by J.S. Cramer
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1987
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 595 KB
- Volume
- 35
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0304-4076
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
Small Sample Bias and Variance of Lincol
โ
D. G. Bonett
๐
Article
๐
2007
๐
John Wiley and Sons
๐
English
โ 267 KB
๐ 2 views
Bootstrap calibration to improve the rel
โ
R. I. C. Chris Francis; Bryan F. J. Manly
๐
Article
๐
2001
๐
John Wiley and Sons
๐
English
โ 235 KB
Estimators of the disturbance variance i
โ
Jean-Marie Dufour
๐
Article
๐
1988
๐
Elsevier Science
๐
English
โ 885 KB
Mean value and variance of gas amplifica
โ
G.D. Alkhazov
๐
Article
๐
1969
๐
Elsevier Science
โ 129 KB
Means and variances of time averages in
โ
Winfried Grassmann
๐
Article
๐
1987
๐
Elsevier Science
๐
English
โ 574 KB
What does a small corporate effect mean?
โ
Thomas H. Brush; Philip Bromiley
๐
Article
๐
1997
๐
John Wiley and Sons
๐
English
โ 79 KB
In a widely cited paper, Rumelt (1991) presents estimates of the relative influence of corporate, business unit, and other influences on business unit profitability and finds the corporation explains almost none of the variability in business unit profitability. Using a Monte Carlo simulation, we ex