Maximal efficiency of PAPNET in the diagnosis of infections in cervicovaginal smears
โ Scribed by Elsi Polus; Tuomo J. Karttunen
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2003
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 37 KB
- Volume
- 28
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 8755-1039
- DOI
- 10.1002/dc.10283
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Background: Determining the false-negative rate (fnr) of cervicovaginal smear interpretation is a necessary step for any quality assessment and improvement program. all tests estimate the fnr, but the accuracy of these estimates varies from test to test. two methods for determining the fnr have
We attempted to reassess the signi'jcance of cervicovaginal Papanicolaou smear(s) in identifying adenocarcinoma (AC) by comparing Papanicolaou smears with histopathology in a pool of 188 patients. The jirst part of study dealt with 95 patients, seen over a 12-yr period (1975-1986), who had tissue di
## Background: To assess the interobserver and intraobserver variation of papanicolaou (pap) smear screening with the computer-assisted (neural network based) papnet testing system in diagnosing cervical smear abnormalities, results of agreement were compared with the interobserver and intraobserve
Data are presented of IgM detection by a neutralization test used routinely in 1,062 patients. Antigens isolated during the period of investigation were EV4, EV7, EV11, EV18, EV21, EV24, EV33, CA9, CB2, CB4, and CB5. No difference was observed in the distribution of IgM-positive sera according to ag