𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Matrix scaling: A geometric proof of Sinkhorn's theorem

✍ Scribed by Alberto Borobia; Rafael Cantó


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1998
Tongue
English
Weight
304 KB
Volume
268
Category
Article
ISSN
0024-3795

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Matrix sealing problems have been extensively studied since Sinkhorn established in 1964 the following result: Any positive square matrix of order n is diagonally equivalent to a unique doubly stochastic matrix of order n, and the diagonal nuttriees which take part in the equivalence are unique up to scalar factors. We present a new elementary proof of the existence part of Sinldlorn's theorem which is based on well-known geometrical interpretations of doubly stochastic matrices and left and right multiplication by diagonal matrices.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


A simple proof for the matrix-geometric
✍ Latouche, Guy 📂 Article 📅 1992 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 239 KB 👁 2 views

## Abstract For block‐partitioned matrices of the __GI/M/__1 type, it has been shown by M. F. Neuts that the stationary probability vector, when it exists, has a matrix‐geometric form. We present here a new proof, which we believe to be the simplest available today.

A Geometric Proof of the Gap Theorem
✍ David S. Herscovici 📂 Article 📅 1998 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 185 KB

Hollmann, Ko rner, and Litsyn used generalized Steiner systems to prove that it is impossible to partition an n-cube into k Hamming spheres if 2<k<n+2. Furthermore, if k=n+2, they showed the only partition of the n-cube consists of a single sphere of radius n&2 and n+1 spheres of radius 0. We give a

A Proof of Shirshov's Theorem
✍ Giuseppe Pirillo 📂 Article 📅 1996 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 188 KB

Sane copiosam tu et uberem messem ex hoc agro collegisti, nos pauculas spicas contemptas tibi potius quam non visas. Triumphus igutur hic omnis tuus est: mihi abunde satis si armillis aut hasta donatus, sequar hunc candidae famae tuae currum. wJustus Lipsius In this paper we prove that, except fo