This book considers evolution at different scales: sequences, genes, gene families, organelles, genomes and species. The focus is on the mathematical and computational tools and concepts, which form an essential basis of evolutionary studies, indicate their limitations, and give them orientation. Re
Mathematics of Evolution and Phylogeny
โ Scribed by Olivier Gascuel
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press, USA
- Year
- 2005
- Tongue
- English
- Leaves
- 443
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
In the early days of the study of evolution the evidence was primatily empirical. There was no underlying theory or undestanding of how changes came about. It is amazing to me that Darwin and Wallace were able to integrate their findings into a generalized theory that has stood the test of time so well.
In recent years the bioinformatics people have been able to look at the basic DNA structure of species and determine changes that earlier observers just observed externally. Needless to say, this is a science that is itself rapidly evolving as more and more genomes are analyzed.
This book came about as the result of a conference organized at the Institut Henri Poincare that was held in Paris in June of 2003. Each of the major presenters were asked to write survey chapters based on the research they had presented with the aim of compiling a compact summary of the state-of-the art mathematical techniques and concepts currently used in the field of molecular phylogenetics and evolution.
This approach has produced a book that is timely when compared with a single author trying to understand each of these areas of research.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
This book considers evolution at different scales: sequences, genes, gene families, organelles, genomes and species. The focus is on the mathematical and computational tools and concepts, which form an essential basis of evolutionary studies, indicate their limitations, and give them orientation. Re
580 pages : 29 cm
Our understanding of angiosperm relationships has changed dramatically during the past ten years. The big picture of angiosperm phylogeny emerged suddenly as a direct result of collaborative molecular analyses, and longstanding views of deep-level relationships required revision. Many major clades o