✦ LIBER ✦

Mass spectrometry, enrichment of uranium, and Iraq

✍ Scribed by Yu. A. Zolotov

Book ID: 110212047
Publisher: SP MAIK Nauka/Interperiodica
Year: 2008
Tongue: English
Weight: 59 KB
Volume: 63
Category: Article
ISSN: 1061-9348
DOI: 10.1134/s1061934808090013

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Critical masses of spherical and hemisph

Critical masses of spherical and hemispherical enriched uranium assemblies

✍ Grover Tuck 📂 Article 📅 1969 🏛 Elsevier Science ⚖ 633 KB

Basic characterization of highly enriche

Basic characterization of highly enriched uranium by gamma spectrometry

✍ Cong Tam Nguyen; József Zsigrai 📂 Article 📅 2006 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 285 KB

Alpha spectrometry and secondary ion mas

Alpha spectrometry and secondary ion mass spectrometry of electrodeposited uranium films

✍ Jozef Kuruc; Dávid Harvan; Dušan Galanda; L’ubomír Mátel; Monika Jerigová; Dušan 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 320 KB

On-Line Trace Enrichment and Determinati

On-Line Trace Enrichment and Determination of Uranium in Waters by Flow Injection Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry

✍ Dadfarnia, Shayessteh; McLeod, Cameron W. 📂 Article 📅 1994 🏛 Society for Applied Spectroscopy 🌐 English ⚖ 531 KB

Electromagnetic isotope enrichment for a

Electromagnetic isotope enrichment for accelerator mass spectrometry of 41Ca

✍ A. Steinhof; K.H. Behr; A. Brünle; E. Roeckl; E. Boaretto; M. Paul; D. Fink; G. 📂 Article 📅 1989 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 968 KB

Determination of (13C)urea enrichment by

Determination of (13C)urea enrichment by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry and gas chromatography/isotope ratio mass spectrometry

✍ Michel Beylot; France David; Yadh Khalfallah; Sylvie Normand; Valerie Large; Hen 📂 Article 📅 1994 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 354 KB 👁 2 views

We present gas chromatographic/mass spectrometric and gas chromatographic/isotope ratio mass spectrometric assays of the 13C enrichment of plasma urea converted to its dimethylaminomethylene derivative. The limits of sensitivity of the two techniques are 0.2% and 0.02%, respectively. The techniques