𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Market structure and the value of growth

✍ Scribed by Keith W. Chauvin; Mark Hirschey


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1997
Tongue
English
Weight
77 KB
Volume
18
Category
Article
ISSN
0143-6570

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


In line with theory suggested by Miller and Modigliani (1961), this paper finds generally positive and statistically significant effects of growth on the current market value of the firm over the 1974-90 period. This intuitive result is not surprising, but the lack of a simple link between the valuation effects of growth and market structure considerations is noteworthy. Importantly, the value of future growth options appears to be closely tied to the firm's ongoing investment in advertising and R&D intangible capital. On the other hand, high current market share does not appear to offer any clear advantage in terms of a firm's ability to expand upon current success.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Growth opportunities, corporate governan
✍ Michael A. FrΓΆhls; Art Keown; Mark McNabb; John Martin πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1998 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 129 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

This paper examines whether differences in investment opportunities and corporate ownership structure can explain the disparate findings of other researchers with regard to the market's price reaction to the announcement of international joint ventures. We study a sample of 320 joint ventures announ

Markets and the measurement of value
✍ Don L. Coursey πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1987 πŸ› Springer US 🌐 English βš– 352 KB

Consumer's surplus and the Hicksian measures of compensating and equivalent variation have a long history in empirical economic analysis. However, at both the theoretical and the empirical level, economists, psychologists, and public choice theorists have not been able to reach a significant consens

The Market Value of Nuclear Power
✍ Nainish K. Gupta; Herbert G. Thompson Jr. πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1999 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 480 KB

In an active market for generation assets prompted by deregulation, some nuclear plants will command higher market prices, but the unresolved issue of stranded costs will continue to be a drag. Controlled deregulation of nuclear assets may provide an interim solution.