This Theme Issue of JRST is devoted to examining critical, feminist, and poststructural theories and the implications these have in considering the ideal, "a science education for all children." These three perspectives are brought together in this issue because they combine a questioning of the fou
Marginalized discourses and scientific literacy
โ Scribed by Obed Norman
- Book ID
- 101268412
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1998
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 37 KB
- Volume
- 35
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0022-4308
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
The central position of this article is that an important component of scientific literacy is an understanding of the reciprocal impact of science and the general culture on each other. The article focuses on the marginalized discourses that have arisen to oppose the racism, sexism, and classism espoused and advocated by mainstream science since its institutionalization until the first half of the 20th century. The article explores the pedagogical value of studying these oppositional discourses to demonstrate the permeability of the boundaries between science and the general culture. It also discusses how the issues raised by these discourses can be used to enhance the scientific literacy of students.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
This article examines the potential relationship between children's knowledge of media texts, formed outside school in informal contexts, and the different kinds of textual knowledge schools themselves construct and validate. Drawing on Bernstein's concepts of horizontal and vertical discourse, the
Intent. The intent of Learned Discourses is to provide a forum for open discussion. These articles reflect the professional opinions of the authors regarding scientific issues. They do not represent SETAC positions or policies. And, although they are subject to editorial review for clarity, consiste
Intent. The intent of Learned Discourses is to provide a forum for open discussion. These articles reflect the professional opinions of the authors regarding scientific issues. They do not represent SETAC positions or policies. And, although they are subject to editorial review for clarity, consiste