𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Mapping studies of the tectal representation of the frog binocular visual field

✍ Scribed by F. Gaillard; G. Galand

Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Year
1981
Tongue
English
Weight
707 KB
Volume
44
Category
Article
ISSN
0014-4819

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

Representation of the binocular visual f
Representation of the binocular visual field in the superior colliculus of the albino rat
✍ Y. -C. Diao; Y. -K. Wang; Y. -M. Xiao πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1983 πŸ› Springer-Verlag 🌐 English βš– 500 KB

Electrophysiological mapping techniques were used to determine the representation of the central field of vision in the superior colliculus of the albino rat. The retinotopic map for the contralateral eye is similar to that found in other mammals. There is an unexpected extensive binocular segment s

Plasticity of binocular visual connectio
Plasticity of binocular visual connections in the frog,Xenopus laevis:reversibility of effects of early visual deprivation
✍ M. J. Keating; E. A. Dawes; S. Grant πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1992 πŸ› Springer-Verlag 🌐 English βš– 871 KB

In frogs, each lobe of the midbrain optic tectum receives two spatially aligned maps of binocular visual space, one through each eye. The map from the contralateral eye is the product of direct retinal input to the tectum, while that from the ipsilateral eye is mediated by a commissural system of co

Effect of stimulus field size and locali
Effect of stimulus field size and localization on the binocular pattern reversal visual evoked response
✍ Osamu Katsumi; Tatsuo Hirose; Tsuyoshi Tanino πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1988 πŸ› Springer-Verlag 🌐 English βš– 574 KB

The role of the central and peripheral stimulus fields on monocular and binocular amplitude and binocular summation of the pattern reversal visual evoked response were investigated. When the central stimulus field size was smaller than 2.4 degrees, there was no significant difference between the amp