Great Britain. It is repn'nted here with the permission of Stephen Hawi and of editor Valerie Denney, who contacted ASHRM when she was in search of an author for the article. We thank ASHRM board member Corbette Doyle for identifying Mr. Ham', and are grateful for all the cooperation that led to the
‘Managing the cracks’: Management development for health care interfaces
✍ Scribed by David J. Hunter
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1990
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 543 KB
- Volume
- 5
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0749-6753
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
The realm of public policy (including health policy) is, in many ways, more complex than that of decision‐making within the corporate organisations found in the private sector. The range of stakeholders is generally wider; many of the ways of influencing action are more subtle and indirect; and, arrangements for representation, accountability and consultation are correspondingly more elaborate. A future of this complexity in healthcare systems is the presence of numerous organisational and managerial interfaces. The paper considers three key sectors and the interfaces between them: primary health care, hospital care, and community care. Proposals for reforming the British National Health Service and community care services are destined to multiply the interfaces to be managed since they are predicated upon a split between purchasing services and providing them. The intention is to encourage a plurality of providers who will compete for contracts. The paper argues that the challenge posed by interface management is probably greater than any other in healthcare management. The requisite skills for successful interface management are reviewed. The paper concludes that these network skills are in short supply and that those responsible for management development in the NHS must tackle this lacuna as a matter of some urgency.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
Strengthening management has been widely promoted as a critical component of any strategy concerned with improving the implementation of primary health care (PHC). Management development programmes are, however, subject to conflicting demands and differing expectations. The situation is confounded b
I n 1985 the Oregon Legislature passed a bill to divert all Medicaid funds for transplants into prenatal care
Background: Parity in insurance coverage for mental health and substance abuse has been a key goal of mental health and substance abuse care advocates in the United States during most of the past 20 years. The push for parity began during the era of indemnity insurance and fee for service payment wh