✦ LIBER ✦

MAMMOGRAPHIC BREAST PATTERN AND THE RISK OF BREAST CANCER

✍ Scribed by Verbeek, A.L.M.; Hendriks, J.H.C.L.; Peeters, P.H.M.; Sturmans, F.

Book ID: 122949509
Publisher: The Lancet
Year: 1984
Tongue: English
Weight: 450 KB
Volume: 323
Category: Article
ISSN: 0140-6736
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(84)90996-6

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Ultrasonographically defined parenchymal

Ultrasonographically defined parenchymal patterns of the breast: Relationship to mammographic patterns and other risk factors for breast cancer

✍ Kaizer, L; Fishell, EK; Hunt, JW 📂 Article 📅 1988 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 88 KB

The effects of exogenous estrogen replac

The effects of exogenous estrogen replacement therapy of the breast: Breast cancer risk and mammographic parenchymal patterns

✍ Kirby I. Bland; Jerry B. Buchanan; Barbara F. Weisberg; Terry A. Hagan; Sr. Lama 📂 Article 📅 1980 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 704 KB

Benign Breast Disease, Mammographic Brea

Benign Breast Disease, Mammographic Breast Density, and the Risk of Breast Cancer

✍ Tice, J. A.; O'Meara, E. S.; Weaver, D. L.; Vachon, C.; Ballard-Barbash, R.; Ker 📂 Article 📅 2013 🏛 Oxford University Press 🌐 English ⚖ 858 KB

Mammographic density and breast cancer r

Mammographic density and breast cancer risk

✍ Carla H. van Gils 📂 Article 📅 1999 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 41 KB

Unfavourable change in mammographic patt

Unfavourable change in mammographic patterns and the breast cancer risk factors

✍ Tiina M. Salminen; Irma E. Saarenmaa; Minna M. Heikkilä; Matti Hakama 📂 Article 📅 1999 🏛 Springer US 🌐 English ⚖ 49 KB

Mammographic densities and risk of breas

Mammographic densities and risk of breast cancer

✍ Audrey F. Saftlas; Robert N. Hoover; Louise A. Brinton; Moyses Szklo; David R. O 📂 Article 📅 1991 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 604 KB

To determine the relation of mammographic densities to subsequent breast cancer risk, a case-control study was undertaken using prediagnostic mammograms of screening program participants. Mammograms of cases (n = 266) and controls (n = 301) were blindly assessed for mammographic densities, which wer