𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Major hazards analysis: An improved method for process hazard analysis

✍ Scribed by Paul Baybutt


Publisher
American Institute of Chemical Engineers
Year
2003
Tongue
English
Weight
641 KB
Volume
22
Category
Article
ISSN
1066-8527

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Process hazard analyses (PHAs) usually focus on major hazardsβ€”fires, explosions, and toxic releases. Traditional PHA methods, such as the Hazard and Operability (HAZOP) study and What‐If analysis, often include scenarios for other hazard types, such as operability problems. Sometimes, this may be desired, but not always. There is a need for a PHA technique that directly and exclusively addresses major process hazards. Such hazards are realized when process containment is lost. Therefore, the method proposed here uses a categorization scheme to guide brainstorming of initiating events that can result in fires, explosions, or toxic releases. It provides a more efficient and, likely, more complete, identification of major hazard scenarios than current PHA methods.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Human Factors Methods for Improving Perf
✍ Attwood, Dennis; Baybutt, Paul; Devlin, Chris; Fluharty, Walter; Hughes, Gareth; πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2006 πŸ› John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 🌐 English βš– 289 KB

Hazard analysis identifies possible hazard scenarios for a process or facility (CCPS, 1992). Qualitative risk estimates are often included in hazard analysis. OSHA's Process Safety Management (PSM) standard, 29 CFR 1910.119 and EPA's Risk Management Program (RMP) rule, 40 CFR Part 68, require that a