𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Magnetic fields in the human hippocampal area evoked by a somatosensory oddball task

✍ Scribed by Yasukazu Hamada; Kimihiko Sugino; Hisashi Kado; Ryoji Suzuki


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2004
Tongue
English
Weight
555 KB
Volume
14
Category
Article
ISSN
1050-9631

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

We recorded neuromagnetic fields evoked by a somatosensory oddball task requiring subjects to discriminate target stimuli from nontarget stimuli, which are different in stimulation intensity, with a mental count of the target stimuli. A whole head type 80‐channel magnetoencephalography (MEG) system with a 50‐mm baseline gradiometer array was used. Targets and nontargets were somatosensory stimuli with an electrical current intensity of twice and three times the sensory threshold, respectively. The source current locations of the evoked magnetic fields in three dimensions and the equivalent current dipole (ECD) moments were calculated by using a single dipole model, assuming the brain as a sphere. In 28 of 63 recording sessions for 7 subjects, the loci of neuronal activities were observed in the left and/or right hippocampal areas. The latency of left hippocampal activity (293 Β± 49 ms) was significantly shorter than that of the right (333 Β± 45 ms) (P = 0.027, non‐paired t‐test). In view of previous studies that have shown the time window of sensory integration as ∼200–300 ms, sensory information may be transferred to hippocampal areas following sensory integration. Β© 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Dantrolene modulates the influence of st
✍ A. Wieraszko πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2000 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 164 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

Direct current-generated magnetic fields (2Β±3 mT, 20-min exposure) exerted biphasic effects on the population spike recorded from hippocampal slices. The initial decrease in the potential, observed during exposure of the slices to magnetic fields was followed by a recovery/amplification phase, which

Difference in somatosensory evoked field
✍ Ken Inoue; Takushi Shirai; Kazuyoshi Nakanishi; Akira Hashizume; Toshihide Harad πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2005 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 349 KB

## Abstract We recently recorded somatosensory evoked fields (SEFs) elicited by compressing the glabrous skin of the finger and decompressing it by using a photosensor trigger. In that study, the equivalent current dipoles (ECDs) for these evoked fields appeared to be physiologically similar to the