✦ LIBER ✦

Lower thresholds of motion for gratings as a function of eccentricity and contrast

✍ Scribed by A. Johnston; M.J. Wright

Book ID: 118371269
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 1985
Tongue: English
Weight: 672 KB
Volume: 25
Category: Article
ISSN: 0042-6989
DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(85)90111-7

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Motion aftereffect as a function of the

Motion aftereffect as a function of the contrast of sinusoidal gratings

✍ Max J. Keck; Thomas D. Palella; Allan Pantle 📂 Article 📅 1976 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 608 KB

Grating visibility as a function of orie

Grating visibility as a function of orientation and retinal eccentricity

✍ Mark A. Berkley; Frederick Kitterle; David W. Watkins 📂 Article 📅 1975 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 769 KB

Contrast sensitivity for vertically and

Contrast sensitivity for vertically and obliquely oriented gratings as a function of grating area

✍ John S. Tootle; M.A. Berkley 📂 Article 📅 1983 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 417 KB

Grating Contrast as a Function of Visual

Grating Contrast as a Function of Visual Angle and Fixation*

✍ MACKAVEY, WILLIAM R. 📂 Article 📅 1967 🏛 Optical Society of America ⚖ 538 KB

Sensitivity to second-order motion as a

Sensitivity to second-order motion as a function of temporal frequency and eccentricity

✍ A.T. Smith; T. Ledgeway 📂 Article 📅 1998 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 759 KB

The human motion VEP as a function of si

The human motion VEP as a function of size and eccentricity of the stimulation field

✍ R. Müller; E. Göpfert; L. Schlykowa; D. Anke 📂 Article 📅 1990 🏛 Springer-Verlag 🌐 English ⚖ 319 KB

A 'motion onset VEP' was elicited by the onset of a pattern drift. The amplitude of the most distinct wave (AN20o) was determined on the following stimulation conditions: eccentricity, 0 to 23 deg; velocity, 1.5 to 16 deg/s; spatial frequency, 0.19 to 2.1 c/deg; and stimulation field size, 0.2 to 16