𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Lower bounds for the job-shop scheduling problem on multi-purpose machines

✍ Scribed by Bernd Jurisch


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1995
Tongue
English
Weight
765 KB
Volume
58
Category
Article
ISSN
0166-218X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


The open shop scheduling problem with a
✍ Y.M. Shafransky; V.A. Strusevich πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1998 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 186 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

The paper considers the open shop scheduling problem to minimize the makespan, provided that one of the machines has to process the jobs according to a given sequence. We show that in the preemptive case the problem is polynomially solvable for an arbitrary number of machines. If preemption is not a

Genetic algorithms for the job-shop sche
✍ Fatima Ghedjati πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1999 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 360 KB

In this paper, we are interested in job-shop scheduling problems with several unrelated parallel machines and precedence constraints between the operations of the jobs (with either linear or non-linear process routings). The objective is to minimize the maximum completion time (Cmax). We propose an

A polynomial-time algorithm for the two-
✍ Vadim G. Timkovsky πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1997 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 1014 KB

We consider a polynomial-time algorithm for the following scheduling problem: Given two machines, where each machine can process at most one job at a time; a set of jobs, where each job can start on or after its release date and consists of a chain of unit-time operations such that the machines have

Lower Bounds for the Union–Find and the
✍ Han La PoutrΓ© πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1996 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 490 KB

A well-known result of Tarjan states that for all n and m n there exists a sequence of n&1 Union and m Find operations that needs at least 0(m . :(m, n)) execution steps on a pointer machine that satisfies the separation condition. Later the bound was extended to 0(n+m. :(m, n)) for all m and n. In