✦ LIBER ✦

Low level occupational benzene exposure and hematological parameters

✍ Scribed by Gerard M.H. Swaen; Ludovic van Amelsvoort; Johannes J. Twisk; Etienne Verstraeten; Ronald Slootweg; James J. Collins; Carol J. Burns

Book ID: 113518071
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 2010
Tongue: English
Weight: 161 KB
Volume: 184
Category: Article
ISSN: 0009-2797
DOI: 10.1016/j.cbi.2010.01.007

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Occupational exposure to low levels of b

Occupational exposure to low levels of benzene: Biomarkers of exposure, effect and susceptibility

✍ M.E. Fracasso; D. Doria; M. Carrieri; G.B. Bartolucci; G. Spatari; M. Manno 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 76 KB

Benzene in blood as a biomarker of low l

Benzene in blood as a biomarker of low level occupational exposure

✍ F. Brugnone; L. Perbellini; L. Romeo; M. Cerpelloni; M. Bianchin; A. Tonello 📂 Article 📅 1999 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 115 KB

Influence of occupational low-level lead

Influence of occupational low-level lead exposure on renal parameters

✍ Marga Verschoor; Anton Wibowo; Robert Herber; Joop van Hemmen; Reinier Zielhuis 📂 Article 📅 1987 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 635 KB

Urinary biomarkers and low-level environ

Urinary biomarkers and low-level environmental benzene concentration: Assessing occupational and general exposure

✍ Anna Barbieri; Francesco Saverio Violante; Laura Sabatini; Francesca Graziosi; S 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 318 KB

Detecting low-level exposure to benzene

📂 Article 📅 1996 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 128 KB

Possible genotoxicity in low level benze

Possible genotoxicity in low level benzene exposure

✍ Višnja Karačić; Ljiljana Skender; Branka Bosner-Cucančić; Ana Bogadi-Sare 📂 Article 📅 1995 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 620 KB

Structural chromosome aberrations and sister chromatid exchanges (SCEs) in peripheral blood were studied in female workers employed in the shoe-making industry in two periods: 1987 (group I; N = 38) and 1992 (group 11; N = 45). Only 11 of the workers were present in both groups and their results are