It is 70 years since Adolf Schultz urged his colleagues to consider how studies of primate growth and development could help them interpret the course of human evolution. This paper considers the evolutionary context of comparative growth studies. It compares and contrasts aspects of the ontogeny of
Longitudinal study of dental development in chimpanzees of known chronological age: Implications for understanding the age at death of Plio-Pleistocene hominids
β Scribed by Anemone, Robert L.; Mooney, Mark P.; Siegel, Michael I.
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1996
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 85 KB
- Volume
- 99
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0002-9483
- DOI
- 10.1002/(sici)1096-8644(199601)99:1<119::aid-ajpa7>3.0.co;2-w
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Reconstruction of life history variables of fossil hominids on the basis of dental development requires understanding of and comparison with the pattern and timing of dental development among both living humans and pongids. Whether dental development among living apes or humans provides a better model for comparison with that of Plio-Pleistocene hominids of the genus Australopithecus remains a contentious point. This paper presents new data on chimpanzees documenting developmental differences in the dentitions of modern humans and apes and discusses their significance in light of recent controversies over the human or pongid nature of australopithecine dental development. Longitudinal analysis of 299 lateral head radiographs from 33 lab-reared chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) of known chronological age allows estimation of means and standard deviations for the age at first appearance of 8 developmental stages in the mandibular molar dentition. Results are compared with published studies of dental development among apes and with published standards for humans. Chimpanzees are distinctly different from humans in two important aspects of dental development. Relative to humans, chimpanzees show advanced molar development vis a vis anterior tooth development, and chimpanzees are characterized by temporal overlap in the calcification of adjacent molar crowns, while humans show moderate to long temporal gaps between the calcification of adjacent molar crowns. In combination with recent work on enamel incremental markers and CAT scans of developing dentitions of Plio-Pleistocene hominids, this evidence supports an interpretation of a rapid, essentially "apelike" ontogeny among australopithecines.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
DO GODS TRULY EXIST? CAN YOU KNOW THE FUTURE? AND WHAT LIES BEYOND THE VEIL OF DEATH? Winter blankets the land, and more than hope has died. Barred by the tower of Avempartha, the western army cannot invade the Fhrey homeland. So it must seek a way across the Nidwalden River before the fane obt
Do Gods Truly exist? Can you know the future? And what lies beyond the veil of death? Winter blankets the land, and more than hope has died. Barred by the tower of Avempartha, the western army cannot invade the Fhrey homeland. So it must seek a way across the Nidwalden River before the fane obtains
Do Gods Truly exist? Can you know the future? And what lies beyond the veil of death? Winter blankets the land, and more than hope has died. Barred by the tower of Avempartha, the western army cannot invade the Fhrey homeland. So it must seek a way across the Nidwalden River before the fane obtains
Meet Amber Benson's "authentically original creation" (*Locus*)... My name is Calliope Reaper-Jones (Callie to my friends). I'm Death's Daughter andβas of very recentlyβthe (reluctant) head of my father's company, Death, Inc. I was gradually learning how to be a businesswoman. Had the pow
The relative development of permanent teeth in samples of Neandertauarchaic Homo and Early Moderflpper Paleolithic hominids is compared to the range of variability found in three recent human samples. Both fossil hominid samples are advanced in relative M2 and M3 development compared to white French