Long-term safety and efficacy of unilateral deep brain stimulation of the thalamus in essential tremor
✍ Scribed by William C. Koller; Kelly E. Lyons; Steven B. Wilkinson; Alexander I. Troster; Rajesh Pahwa
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2001
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 64 KB
- Volume
- 16
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0885-3185
- DOI
- 10.1002/mds.1089
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Our objective was to investigate the long‐term safety and efficacy of unilateral deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the VIM nucleus of the thalamus in essential tremor. Forty‐nine patients were evaluated for DBS between December 1993 and March 1998. Tremor was assessed by a clinical rating scale at 3 and 12 months and then yearly. Three patients were not implanted, seven were explanted prior to 24 months, 11 were lost to long‐term follow‐up, and three died from unrelated causes. Twenty‐five patients were evaluated with follow‐up greater than or equal to 2 years. The last postsurgical follow‐up occurred on average 40.2 ± 14.7 months after surgery. Tremor scores were significantly improved with stimulation on at the long‐term follow‐up as compared to baseline. There was no change in tremor scores from baseline to long‐term follow‐up with stimulation off. There was no significant change in any stimulus parameters from 3 months to the long‐term follow‐up. Three patients had asymptomatic intracerebral hemorrhages and one patient had postoperative seizures. Stimulus‐related adverse reactions were mild and easily controlled with changes in stimulus parameters. Device‐related complications were common and required repeated surgical procedures. Unilateral DBS of the thalamus has long‐term efficacy in some patients for treatment of essential tremor. However, this therapy is compromised by loss of efficacy in some patients and device complications which increase the risk of additional surgical procedures. © 2001 Movement Disorder Society.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
OBJECTIVE: To compare outcome in Essential Tremor (ET) patients who have undergone either thalamotomy or Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) of the thalamus. BACKGROUND: Although both thalamotomy and thalamic DBS are effective surgical treatments of tremor, it is not known if one procedure is superior to
## Abstract Thalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) is proven to suppress tremor in Parkinson's disease (PD) and essential tremor (ET). However, there are few reports on its long‐term efficacy. We studied the efficacy of DBS at 2 years and 6–7 years after electrode implantations in the ventrointermed
## Abstract Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the thalamus reduces tremor in patients with essential tremor (ET). However, few studies have determined the degree of improvement in daily functioning associated with DBS. We developed a selfreport Tremor Activities of Daily Living Scale (TADLS) to compa
## Abstract To evaluate the posterior subthalamic area (PSA) as a target for deep brain stimulation (DBS) in the treatment of essential tremor (ET). The ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus is the traditional target for DBS in the treatment of ET. Recent studies have presented beneficial ef
## Abstract Orthostatic tremor (OT) is a disabling movement disorder associated with postural and gait impairment in the elderly. Medical therapy often yields insufficient benefit. We report the clinical and electrophysiological data on two patients with medication‐refractory OT treated with deep b