Long-term performance of bioreactors cleaning mercury-contaminated wastewater and their response to temperature and mercury stress and mechanical perturbation
✍ Scribed by H. von Canstein; Y. Li; I. Wagner-Döbler
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2001
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 135 KB
- Volume
- 74
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0006-3592
- DOI
- 10.1002/bit.1110
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
The long‐term performance of bioreactors retaining mercury from contaminated industrial wastewater was analyzed at the laboratory scale, and its response to mechanical perturbations (gas bubbles and shaking) as well as to physical (increased temperature and hydraulic load) and chemical stresses (increased mercury concentration) likely to occur during on site operation was studied. Two packed‐bed bioreactors with 80‐cm^3^ lava chips as biofilm carrier were inoculated with nine Hg(II)‐resistant natural isolates of α‐ and γ‐proteobacteria. Chloralkali wastewater containing ionic mercury (3.0 to 9.7 mg/L Hg^2+^), amended with sucrose and yeast extract, flowed through the bioreactors at 160 mL/h. During the 16‐month investigation the bioreactors showed no sign of depleted performance in terms of mercury‐retaining capacity. After 16 months, both bioreactors still retained 96% of the mercury load. The performance of the bioreactors was sensitive to mechanical perturbations (e.g., sheer forces of gas bubbles). Shifts to higher Hg^2+^ inflow concentrations initially decreased the mercury retention efficacy slightly. However, the bioreactors could adapt to Hg^2+^ concentrations of up to 7.6 mg/L within several days. Old biofilms were less affected than the younger ones. The performance of the bioreactors was not affected by an increase in temperature up to 41°C and an increased volumetric load (up to 240 mL/h). The bioreactors regained activity spontaneously after the stress had stopped. Recovery could be accelerated by increased nutrient concentration, although this may lead to blocking of the packed bed. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Biotechnol Bioeng 74: 212–219, 2001.