✦ LIBER ✦

Long-term cosmetic changes after breast conserving therapy for patients with stage I and II breast cancer treated in the EORTC “boost versus no boost” trial

✍ Scribed by M. Immink; H. Putter; J. Visser; H. Bartelink; J. Cardoso; M.J. Cardoso; E.M. Noordijk; P.M. Poortmans; C.C. Warlam-Rodenhuis; H. Struikmans

Book ID: 119598099
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 2008
Tongue: English
Weight: 55 KB
Volume: 6
Category: Article
ISSN: 1359-6349
DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6349(08)70605-0

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

The influence of patient, tumor and trea

The influence of patient, tumor and treatment factors on the cosmetic results after breast-conserving therapy in the EORTC ‘boost vs. no boost’ trial

✍ Conny Vrieling; Laurence Collette; Alain Fourquet; Willem J. Hoogenraad; Jean-Cl 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 142 KB

28 oral The EORTC “boost versus no boost

28 oral The EORTC “boost versus no boost” trial: local control and cosmesis in patients with conservative management of early breast cancer

📂 Article 📅 2001 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 131 KB

473 oral Cosmetic aspects and long-term

473 oral Cosmetic aspects and long-term radiation toxicity after breast conserving therapy in early-stage breast cancer patients treated with 2.5Gy per fraction

📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 120 KB

Re the article: “Impact of the boost dos

Re the article: “Impact of the boost dose of 10 Gy versus 26 Gy in patients with early stage breast cancer after a microscopically incomplete lumpectomy: 10-year results of the randomised EORTC boost trial. On behalf of the EORTC Radiation Oncology and Breast Cancer Groups. Radiother Oncol 2009;90:80–5”

✍ Anusheel Munshi 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 41 KB