๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Long-term benzodiazepine treatment: Is it ever justified?

โœ Scribed by Y. Chen; M. Lader


Book ID
102860260
Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1990
Tongue
English
Weight
1023 KB
Volume
5
Category
Article
ISSN
0885-6222

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Long-Term Benzodiazepine Treatment: Is It Ever Justified?

Long-term benzodiazepine treatment is still used for various indications. It is now accepted that benzodiazepines can cause dependence even in normal therapeutic doses in long-term use. Is long-term use therefore ever justified? This review marshals the evidence for and against the elrectiveness of benzodiazepines in long-term use and their side-effects, especially psychological deficits. The topic of dependence is then addressed. It is concluded that although short-term use is justified in view of the etrectiveness and safety of the benzodiazepines, long-term benzodiazepine use is much more problematic. In the absence of comprehensive long-term efficacy and safety data, constant vigilance is necessary to prevent unplanned long-term use.

KEY woRDs-Benzodiazepines, dependence, long-term use

In psychiatry, benzodiazepines are still used in the long-term therapy of chronic anxiety disorder, panic disorder, insomnia and some epileptic conditions. It is now clearly evident that benzodiazepines (BZ) can cause dependence as shown by a withdrawal syndrome on cessation of treatment (Rickels, 1987;Lader, 1989). Warnings have been issued against long-term BZ treatment (Committee on Review of Medicines, 1980; Committee on Safety of Medicines, 1988). But is such use ever justified?

Two main situations can arise. The first is where patients have used BZ for longer periods than 4 weeks for relief of severe symptomatic distress but they, and sometimes their doctors, find the withdrawal symptoms so distressing and protracted that they resume medication indefinitely. The second is where patients, and their doctors, deny any substantial risk of dependence and continue to use the drugs for long-term management. They conclude that long-term BZ use is not dangerous, because the psychological and social functioning of patients with BZ dependence is apparently normal. In these circumstances, BZ misuse seems frequent. In this review we summarize some of the publications concerning these alternative scenarios, concentrating on recent papers.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


The effects of long-term benzodiazepine
โœ Martyn S. Sakol; Kevin G. Power ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1988 ๐Ÿ› Springer ๐ŸŒ English โš– 420 KB

Twelve patients were assessed prior to and during 4 weeks' graded withdrawal from long-term benzodiazepine treatment. A control group of ten healthy drug-free individuals were assessed over the same period. Psychometric measures included Four Choice Reaction Time--Decision (FCRT-D), Four Choice Reac

Chlordiazepoxide loses its anxiolytic ac
โœ Sandra V. Vellucci; Sandra E. File ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1979 ๐Ÿ› Springer ๐ŸŒ English โš– 480 KB

The biochemical and behavioural effects of acute, 5, 15 and 25 days treatment with chlordiazepoxide (CDP, 5 mg/kg) were examined in the rat. After 5 days of drug treatment, 5-hydroxytryptamine (5HT) levels in the midbrain, hypothalamus and cortex were significantly higher than those of the correspon

Causes, effects and treatment of long-te
โœ Susan Golombok ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1989 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 589 KB

Psychological mechanisms underlying addictive behaviour are described with particular reference to the role of learning and cognition in long-term benzodiazepine use. The effects of long-term tranquillizer use on cognitive functioning are then discussed, and it is suggested that the long-term use of