๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Long cycles in critical graphs

โœ Scribed by Noga Alon; Michael Krivelevich; Paul Seymour


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2000
Tongue
English
Weight
57 KB
Volume
35
Category
Article
ISSN
0364-9024

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Cycles in butterfly graphs
โœ Hwang, Shien-Ching; Chen, Gen-Huey ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2000 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 214 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

Three problems in connection with cycles on the butterfly graphs are studied in this paper. The first problem is to construct complete uniform cycle partitions for the butterfly graphs. Suppose that

Longest cycles in tough graphs
โœ Jung, H.A.; Wittmann, P. ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1999 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 347 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

In this article, we establish bounds for the length of a longest cycle C in a 2-connected graph G in terms of the minimum degree ฮด and the toughness t. It is shown that C is a Hamiltonian cycle or |C| โ‰ฅ (t + 1)ฮด + t.

Disjoint cycles in star-free graphs
โœ Markus, Lisa R.; Snevily, Hunter S. ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1996 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 322 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

A graph is claw-free if it does not contain K l , 3 as an induced subgraph. It is Kl,,-free if it does not contain K l , r as an induced subgraph. We show that if a graph is Kl,,-free ( r 2 4), only p + 2r -1 edges are needed to insure that G has t w o disjoint cycles. As an easy consequence w e ge

Edge disjoint Hamilton cycles in graphs
โœ Guojun Li ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2000 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 125 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views
Long cycles passing through a specified
โœ Hirohata, Kazuhide ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1998 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 247 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

## For a graph G and an integer an independent set of vertices in G}. Enomoto proved the following theorem. Let s โ‰ฅ 1 and let G be a (s + 2)-connected graph. Then G has a cycle of length โ‰ฅ min{|V (G)|, ฯƒ 2 (G) -s} passing through any path of length s. We generalize this result as follows. Let k โ‰ฅ