๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Logical formalisms for representing bipolar preferences

โœ Scribed by Souhila Kaci


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2008
Tongue
English
Weight
113 KB
Volume
23
Category
Article
ISSN
0884-8173

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Bipolar preferences distinguish between negative preferences inducing what is acceptable by complementation and positive preferences representing what is really satisfactory. This article provides a review of the main logics for preference representation. Representing preferences in a bipolar logical way has the advantage of enabling us to reason about them, while increasing their expressive power in a cognitively meaningful way. In the article, we first focus on the possibilistic logic setting and then discuss two other logics: qualitative choice logic and penalty logic. Finally, an application of bipolar preferences querying systems is outlined.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Difference logics for preference
โœ Dennis J. Packard ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1987 ๐Ÿ› Springer US ๐ŸŒ English โš– 269 KB
Preferred answer sets for extended logic
โœ Gerhard Brewka; Thomas Eiter ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1999 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 442 KB

In this paper, we address the issue of how Gelfond and Lifschitz's answer set semantics for extended logic programs can be suitably modified to handle prioritized programs. In such programs an ordering on the program rules is used to express preferences. We show how this ordering can be used to defi

On consistency in probabilistic logic fo
โœ Kim Allan Andersen ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1998 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 983 KB

One of the problems (mainly unsolved) in probabilistic logic is to consistently assign probabilities to logical formulas. In this paper we consider Horn formulas represented by B-hypertrees. We give a set of necessary conditions that any valid assignment of probabilities to the logical formulas shou

Quantification for Peirce's preferred sy
โœ Atwell R. Turquette ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1981 ๐Ÿ› Springer Netherlands ๐ŸŒ English โš– 610 KB

Without introducing quantifiers, minimal axiomatic systems have already been constructed for l%irce's triadic logics. The present paper constructs a dual pair of axiomatic systems which can be used to introduce quantifiers into Peirce's preferred system of triadic logic. It is assumed (on the basis