Locational Errors in Maps from Environmental Surveys and Their Implications for Information Extraction
✍ Scribed by P.G. Angold; A.M. Gurnell; P.J. Edwards
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1996
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 300 KB
- Volume
- 47
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0301-4797
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Information on all maps, including those which depict characters of the natural environment, is subject to locational error. 2. Locational errors on field-sketched maps are attributable to inaccuracies both in the base map itself and in the method of locating and recording features onto the base map. 3. Two main sources of error associated with field sketch mapping were quantified using the River Corridor Survey maps as an example. First, channel widths are routinely exaggerated on these maps to allow recording of inchannel features. Distortions of river bank length of the order of 25% were shown to arise from a four-fold exaggeration of the width of a sinuous channel. Second, discrepancies in feature location of the order of 20% were found along a 500 m river stretch, although errors could be reduced to approximately 2% if undistorted, large-scale base maps were used. 4. An abundance scale appropriate to the inherent locational inaccuracy was devised to extract semi-quantitative information from River Corridor Surveys recorded on distorted base maps. Application of this scale to 29 River Corridor Survey maps of a 14•5 km river corridor produced a useful representation of environmental gradients within the corridor. 5. With the increasing potential to integrate and analyse environmental information within large computer databases including Geographic Information Systems, it is essential that the level of accuracy is recognised and quantified so that the errors can be allowed for in the development of methods of extracting information from the maps.