Localization function study of excitation processes in a set of small isoelectronic molecules
✍ Scribed by D. B. Chesnut
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2001
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 153 KB
- Volume
- 22
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0192-8651
- DOI
- 10.1002/jcc.1125
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Electron localization function (ELF) theory is used to characterize changes that occur upon excitation from ground singlet to first excited triplet states in a series of isoelectronic 16‐electron molecules including H~2~CCH~2~, HNCH~2~, H~2~CO, HNNH, HNO, and O~2~ (ground triplet to excited singlet). ELF allows one to visualize lone pair or nonbonding electrons, and in these cases the π→π* or n→π excitation processes involved lead to an effective 90° rotation of the electronic structure about one heavy atom center and consequent distortion towards pyramidal symmetry about both heavy atom centers. The heavy atom bond lengths change very little in those cases where effectively two‐center three‐electron bonds can be formed (HNNH, HNO, and O~2~) while a significant lengthening occurs in those cases where hydrogen atoms prevent such interactions (H~2~CCH~2~, HNCH~2~, and H~2~CO). It is shown that both ELF basin populations and atoms‐in‐molecules (AIM) delocalization indices reflect expected bond orders for conventional single and double bonds provided one compares the ratio of the molecular quantities rather than their absolute magnitudes. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Comput Chem 22: 1702–1711, 2001
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Geometric parameters and energies have been calculated for the ground and first excited states of the gold dimer using effective core potentials (ECPs) and a range of standard density functional theory (DFT) models. After initial evaluation, the B3P86 theoretical model was the procedure employed
A number of authors have documented complaints made by consumers about psychological reports. Prominent among these complaints are that basic data are not included, that psychological terms whose meanings are not certain are used, and that the logic of the report is unclear. Ownby and Wallbrown (198