๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Local anesthesia in pediatric patients: Topical TAC versus lidocaine

โœ Scribed by AB Anderson; C Colecchi; R Baronoski; TG DeWitt


Book ID
104310976
Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1990
Tongue
English
Weight
327 KB
Volume
19
Category
Article
ISSN
1097-6760

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Lacerations requiring sutures are a common surgical emergency in children. Traditional anesthesia prior to suturing has been intradermal lidocaine. TAC (0.5% tetracaine, 1:2,000 adrenalin, 11.8% cocaine) is a topically applied anesthetic. A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical study was conducted to test the hypothesis that topical TAC and intradermai lidocaine are equally efficacious with respect to patient compliance with the suturing process, ie, anesthetic application and placement of sutures, and development of wound complications. Patients less than 18 years old, with lacerations 5 cm or less in length, located in well vascularized, nonmucous membrane areas were included. Patients were entered into the intradermal or topical groups; the intradermaI group received lidocaine and the topical group was randomized to receive either TAG or placebo. One hundred fifty-one patients were enrolled in the study. There was no significant difference in the rates of successful initial anesthesia with TAC (89%) and Iidocaine (79%). TAC was significantly better (P < .002) with regard to patient compliance with the suturing process than lidocaine or placebo. Seventeen percent of patients who received placebo had initial anesthesia. These results suggest that TAC, when applied correctly, may be the preferred anesthetic for laceration repair in children.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES