The pediatric end-stage liver disease (PELD) model accurately estimates 90-day waitlist mortality for pediatric liver transplant candidates, but it has been unclear if PELD can identify patients who will derive survival benefit from undergoing liver transplantation (LT), if it correlates with posttr
Liver transplant recipient survival benefit with living donation in the model for endstage liver disease allocation era
β Scribed by Carl L. Berg; Robert M. Merion; Tempie H. Shearon; Kim M. Olthoff; Robert S. Brown Jr.; Talia B. Baker; Gregory T. Everson; Johnny C. Hong; Norah Terrault; Paul H. Hayashi; Robert A. Fisher; James E. Everhart
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2011
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 236 KB
- Volume
- 54
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0270-9139
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Receipt of a living donor liver transplant (LDLT) has been associated with improved survival compared with waiting for a deceased donor liver transplant (DDLT). However, the survival benefit of liver transplant has been questioned for candidates with Model for Endstage Liver Disease (MELD) scores <15, and the survival advantage of LDLT has not been demonstrated during the MELD allocation era, especially for low MELD patients. Transplant candidates enrolled in the Adult-to-Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Cohort Study after February 28, 2002 were followed for a median of 4.6 years. Starting at the time of presentation of the first potential living donor, mortality for LDLT recipients was compared to mortality for patients who remained on the waiting list or received DDLT (no LDLT group) according to categories of MELD score (<15 or 15) and diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Of 868 potential LDLT recipients (453 with MELD <15; 415 with MELD 15 at entry), 712 underwent transplantation (406 LDLT; 306 DDLT), 83 died without transplant, and 73 were alive without transplant at last follow-up. Overall, LDLT recipients had 56% lower mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 5 0.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32-0.60; P < 0.0001). Among candidates without HCC, mortality benefit was seen both with MELD <15 (HR 5 0.39; P 5 0.0003) and MELD 15 (HR 5 0.42; P 5 0.0006). Among candidates with HCC, a benefit of LDLT was not seen for MELD <15 (HR 5 0.82, P 5 0.65) but was seen for MELD 15 (HR 5 0.29, P 5 0.043). Conclusion: Across the range of MELD scores, patients without HCC derived a significant survival benefit when undergoing LDLT rather than waiting for DDLT in the MELD liver allocation era.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Biliary complications remain a significant problem following liver transplantation in the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) era. We hypothesized that donor, recipient, and technical variables may differentially affect anastomotic biliary complications in MELD era liver transplants. We reviewe
It has been suggested that hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) may have worse outcomes after liver transplantation (LT) because of more aggressive tumor biology. In this study, we determined the post-LT survival of HCC patients with and without HCV using United Netwo
The ability of the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score to capture the urgency of transplantation may not be generalizable to patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) because these patients face unique risks of death or removal from the liver transplant waitlist due to disease-sp