## Dear Sirs, Recently Chisti et al. (1988) proposed a liquid circulation model for airlift reactors. They stated that the influence of the wall-drag on liquid circulation is negligible relative to the frictional losses in the top and bottom connecting sections. Experimental data obtained by Verl
Liquid circulation in airlift reactors
✍ Scribed by M.Y. Chisti; B. Halard; M. Moo-Young
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1988
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 734 KB
- Volume
- 43
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0009-2509
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Energy balance over an airlift loop is used to obtain a theoretical equation [eq. (16)] for the prediction of liquid circulation velocity in those devices. The resulting equation is shown to satisfactorily describe most of the available liquid circulation data (13 different airlift reactors) for a large range of reactor operating scales (0.06-1.06 m3 liquid volumes) including measurements on two pilot scale vessels. The equation applies to both external-and internal-loop types of airlifts over almost two decades of liquid circulation velocities (0.027-1.05 m s-'), reactor height range of 1.368.5 m, and riser-to-downcomer crosssectional area ratios in the range 0.5-9.1. The liquid circulation rate is predicted to increase with the square root of the reactor height. The influence of wall-drag on liquid circulation is shown to be negligible relative to the impact of the frictional losses in the top and bottom connecting sections between the riser and the downcomer where abrupt changes of flow direction take place. Energy dissipation due to wakes behind rising bubbles is most significant.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract The effects of the horizontal connection length (0.1 ± __L~e~__ ± 0.5 m), the cross‐sectional area ratio of downcomer‐to‐riser (0.11 ± A~d~/A~r~± 0.53), and the superficial gas velocity on gas phase holdups in the riser and downcomer were studied. The circulation liquid velocity, the mi
## Abstract The role of the gas–liquid separator on hydrodynamic characteristics in an internal‐loop airlift reactor (ALR) was investigated. Both gas holdup and liquid velocity were measured in a 30 dm^3^ airlift reactor with two different head configurations: with and without an enlarged separator