Is it really a "law" of languages encompassing everything from human to monkey to DNA? Or is it just an empirical curiosity, of no more system-theoretic significance than, say, a spurious correlation?. But the empirical evidence is mounting that when we finally manage to create a theoretical struct
Linguistics and law
β Scribed by Rah
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Year
- 1994
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 200 KB
- Volume
- 34
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0015-7368
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
El Martin has worked hard for a job in IT, but his slang-ridden speech could crush his dreams. Linguistics researcher Henry Fairhaven can help... and get the evidence he needs to publish. When their dreams collide, they must choose between their careers and a future together.
## Abstract The analytic advantages of central concepts from linguistics and information theory, and the analogies demonstrated between them, for understanding patterns of retrieval from fullβtext indexes to documents are developed. The interaction between the syntagm and the paradigm in computatio
## Abstract An analogy is established between the syntagm and paradigm from Saussurean linguistics and the message and messages for selection from the information theory initiated by Claude Shannon. The analogy is pursued both as an end in itself and for its analytic value in understanding patterns
The April 4, 1976, issue of Cognition ran an attack by Dresher and Hornstein (D-H) on AI-based linguistic research. There were replies in the May 2, 1977, issue of Cognition by Schank and Wilensky (S-W) and by Winograd (W) and a rebuttal by D-H. The attack seems to have been interpreted by S-W and