Linguistic Structure in Language Processing
β Scribed by Greg N. Carlson, Michael K. Tanenhaus (auth.), Greg N. Carlson, Michael K. Tanenhaus (eds.)
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Year
- 1988
- Tongue
- English
- Leaves
- 417
- Series
- Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics 7
- Edition
- 1
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
The papers in this volume are intended to exemplify the state of experimental psycho linguistics in the middle to later 1980s. Our overΒ riding impression is that the field has come a long way since the earlier work of the 1950s and 1960s, and that the field has emerged with a renewed strength from a difficult period in the 1970s. Not only are the theoretical issues more sharply defined and integrated with existing issues from other domains ("modularity" being one such example), but the experimental techniques employed are much more sophisticated, thanks to the work of numerous psychologists not necessarily interested in psycholinguistics, and thanks to improving technologies unavailable a few years ago (for instance, eye-trackers). We selected papers that provide a coherent, overall picture of existing techniques and issues. The volume is organized much as one might organize an introductory linguistics course - beginning with sound and working "up" to meanΒ ing. Indeed, the first paper, Rebecca Treiman's, begins with consideraΒ tion of syllable structure, a phonological consideration, and the last, Alan Garnham's, exemplifies some work on the interpretation of proΒ nouns, a semantic matter. In between are found works concentrating on morphemes, lexical structures, and syntax. The cross-section represented in this volume is by necessity incomΒ plete, since we focus only on experimental work directed at underΒ standing how adults comprehend and produce language. We do not include any works on language acquisition, first or second.
β¦ Table of Contents
Front Matter....Pages i-viii
Introduction....Pages 1-26
The Internal Structure of the Syllable....Pages 27-52
Reading Complex Words....Pages 53-105
A Synthesis of Some Recent Work in Sentence Production....Pages 107-156
The Isolability of Syntactic Processing....Pages 157-196
Neuropsychological Evidence for Linguistic Modularity....Pages 197-238
Parsing Complexity and a Theory of Parsing....Pages 239-272
Comprehending Sentences with Long-Distance Dependencies....Pages 273-317
Thematic Structures and Sentence Comprehension....Pages 319-357
Integrating Information in Text Comprehension: The Interpretation of Anaphoric Noun Phrases....Pages 359-399
Back Matter....Pages 401-415
β¦ Subjects
Psycholinguistics
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
This book presents J?rgen Rischel's most important work on language and sound structure. It includes some of the most original and groundbreaking research of four decades. The chapters focus on stress, syllabification, accent, and vowel harmony, and their interactions with other aspects of language.
This volume brings together a series of studies of morphological processing in Germanic (English, German, Dutch), Romance (French, Italian), and Slavic (Polish, Serbian) languages. The question of how morphologically complex words are organized and processed in the mental lexicon is addressed from d
This volume brings together a series of studies of morphological processing in Germanic (English, German, Dutch), Romance (French, Italian), and Slavic (Polish, Serbian) languages. The question of how morphologically complex words are organized and processed in the mental lexicon is addressed from d
<p>This volume brings together a series of studies of morphological processing in Germanic (English, German, Dutch), Romance (French, Italian), and Slavic (Polish, Serbian) languages. The question of how morphologically complex words are organized and processed in the mental lexicon is addressed fro
During most of the 20th century, the classical Saussurean distinction between language usage and language structure remained untranscendable in much linguistic theory. The dominant view, propagated in particular by generative grammar, was that there are structural facts and usage facts, and that in