✦ LIBER ✦

Limits of Data Analysis in Scientific Inference: Reply to Sleep et al.

✍ Scribed by ROBERT J. STEIDL

Book ID: 119931571
Publisher: The Wildlife Society
Year: 2007
Tongue: English
Weight: 54 KB
Volume: 71
Category: Article
ISSN: 0022-541X
DOI: 10.2193/2007-187

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Reply to Moffitt et al.: Causal inferenc

Reply to Moffitt et al.: Causal inference from observational data remains difficult

✍ Rogeberg, O. 📂 Article 📅 2013 🏛 National Academy of Sciences 🌐 English ⚖ 494 KB

Inferring ecological mechanisms from hun

Inferring ecological mechanisms from hunting bag data in wildlife management: a reply to Blanco-Aguiar et al. (2012)

✍ Marcos Moleón, Pablo Almaraz, José A. Sánchez-Zapata 📂 Article 📅 2013 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 286 KB

Reply to comment by M. Lanfredi et al. t

Reply to comment by M. Lanfredi et al. to “Variations in northern vegetation activity inferred from satellite data of vegetation index during 1981 to 1999” by L. Zhou et al.

✍ Kaufmann, R. K. 📂 Article 📅 2003 🏛 American Geophysical Union 🌐 English ⚖ 344 KB

Reply [to “Comment on ‘Stochastic analys

Reply [to “Comment on ‘Stochastic analysis of oxygen-limited biodegradation in three-dimensionally heterogeneous aquifers’ by F. Miralles-Wilhelm et al.”]

✍ Miralles-Wilhelm, Fernando; Gelhar, Lynn W.; Kapoor, Vivek 📂 Article 📅 1998 🏛 American Geophysical Union 🌐 English ⚖ 332 KB

Poor reproducibility and inference in hy

Poor reproducibility and inference in hydrogen-stable-isotope studies of avian movement: A reply to Wunder et al. (2009)

✍ Adam D. Smith, Casey A. Lott and Jeff P. Smith, Kara C. Donohue, Sara Wittenberg 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 University of California Press 🌐 English ⚖ 202 KB

Reply to Schmitt et al.: Data-filtering

Reply to Schmitt et al.: Data-filtering schemes for avoiding double-counting in circle sequencing

✍ Hussmann, J. A.; Lou, D. I.; Sawyer, S. L.; Press, W. H. 📂 Article 📅 2014 🏛 National Academy of Sciences 🌐 English ⚖ 530 KB